Friday, January 28, 2011

Dwight Schrute Proclaims There’s No Such Thing as a “Sales Team” – Is He Right?


During the latest episode of The Office on NBC, Dwight Schrute expressed a sentiment shared – but, thankfully, rarely spoken – by sales reps everywhere.  In response to Andy’s whining that salespeople are supposed to help each other out and be a team, Dwight proclaimed, “We're no more a team than the people staying in the same hotel are a team."
Well, that’s certainly a brutal, cynical assessment of a sales team’s dynamics.
But let’s face it: If a sales rep’s compensation and performance review are based solely on his individual sales performance, then how invested is he in helping out his fellow “teammates?” Sure, the sales manager’s success depends on the entire team’s performance – so the manager wants them to cooperate to the extent such cooperation results in better overall performance – but that doesn’t make a stitch of difference to each individual rep.
Want your reps to behave like team members and not just cohabitants in a hotel?  Here are 4 suggestions that might help:
1.       Comp them on team performance.  Not all managers have the authority to adjust compensation plans, but those who do could create a more cooperative team environment by adding a team performance metric to their reps’ compensation plans. 
Special Considerations:
·         You’ll have to give considerable thought to how this compensation might be structured:  What percentage of compensation is attributed to team success? What metric will you target – total team revenue? performance against plan? minimum performance among all reps? Will there be any subjective or anecdotal data that will factor in?  If so, might this cause resentment and accusations of favoritism?
·         Also, you’ll need to keep in mind that such comp plan alterations might have some undesirable, unintended consequences.  For example, your very best performers might bristle at the thought of having even a small part of their compensation dependent on the performance of other reps.  Your effort to create a cohesive sales team might result in your super stud walking out the door.

2.       Get them together often and outside of work.  A much less costly method of driving sales team cohesion is to foster an environment in which your reps can get to know and like each other informally. Provided your team is not comprised of social spazzes, you can probably let social inertia take care of itself.  (If the social spaz factor is high, you might need to more assertively stir the pot to initiate mingling.  And if that’s the case, then you might have even bigger issues than lack of cooperation, as socially spazzy salespeople aren’t often great at making sales.) 

Your teammates’ familiarity with each other will invariably lead to genuine concern among the members of the team, and a greater willingness to help each other out.  You can repeatedly fuel the pump by reinforcing cooperative behavior by publicly and privately praising those who engage in such behavior meaningfully.
Special Considerations:
·         Sure, it’s easier to implement than overhauling your comp plan, but it might not work.  Let’s face it – time outside of work is a precious commodity, and not all people, particularly hard-working and/or familied ones want to mix it up with colleagues during their free time. 
·         How are you going to characterize these socials when you organize them?  Are they optional or mandatory?  Do you risk pissing off your studs by making them partake in these events – if so, is team cohesion worth it?  Are you treating for them during these gatherings, or will the reps have to pay their own way?

3.       Create Team Interdependence through Expertise.  There’s nothing that spurs cooperation more than true team interdependence.  Sales Rep A will certainly get the help he needs from Sales Rep B if Rep B knows that he’ll eventually need help from Rep A.  Managers can create interdependence by requiring subject-matter expertise in each rep.  Requiring reps to take classes or present at conferences or become fluent in a certain vertical can all build expertise that other reps might leverage as they require that expertise to close certain sales.
Special Considerations:
·         Are the areas of expertise deemed equally important by the sales reps?  If not, then those with the perceived “high value” areas of expertise might be more inclined to figure things out “low value” areas of expertise for themselves rather than reach out to another team member for help.
·         Can reps easily acquire expertise in one or more area relatively easily on their own?  If so, some of your more ambitious reps might acquire this expertise and therefore reduce their dependence on their fellow reps. 

4.       Challenge a Rival Team within the Company.  Even if the only thing at stake is lunch and bragging rights, you can marshall the competitive spirit that hopefully exists on your team by challenging your arch rival sales manager to a team battle. 
Special Considerations:
·         How can you set the contest up to encourage cooperation?  Simply competing on total productivity might drive your high performers to simply sell more on their own and become even less cooperative.  One way might be to require everyone on the winning team to submit a certain minimum amount of business, or insist that deals need to come from a variety of territories in order for a team to claim victory.
·         Losing always sucks, so are you prepared to pick up the pieces if the team feels down in the (unlikely, of course) event of defeat?
I’m sure there are skeptics among you who are thinking (admirably, I might add) that failing to cooperate with one’s peers is a completely unprofessional way to behave and that they would have no place as sales reps in a team or company such as yours.  You’re wondering if “normal” sales environments (Dunder Mifflin, of course, is as fictional as it is dysfunctional) need such interventions at all.
Ok…fair enough.  But how do you monitor and discourage non-cooperative behavior?  It’s easy when their rudeness in Dwight-like and in-your-face.  But what about keeping in check passively uncooperative behavior? -  The rep doesn’t return phone calls to a peer in need until long after the need has passed (“hey, I was busy…sorry!”).  Or one rep withholds a valuable piece of market data that might have sealed a deal for a fellow rep (“look, who knew you’d actually need that in your territory?!”).
Look, Dwight Schrute is clearly crazy, but he isn’t dumb – he says what perhaps others are thinking.  Creating a sense of team in most sales environments is extremely challenging – and often not worth the effort to achieve it!  But if you firmly believe that cooperative behavior will enhance your team’s overall effectiveness (and therefore improve your performance), then give one of the suggestions above a try.

About Sean O'Neil
Sean O’Neil is Principal and CEO of One to One Leadership (www.one2oneleadership.com), a sales and management training firm with clients that include the National Basketball Association, Major League Soccer, News Corporation, First Data, ADP, Xerox, the Oakland Raiders and the New York Knicks.  Sean and John Kulisek co-authored Bare Knuckle People Management:  Creating Success with the Team You Have – Winners, Losers, Misfits and All, which is due to be published in May 2011.  Sean has contributed to or been featured in, among others, The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Selling Power Magazine and Incentive Magazine.

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Mike Tomlin – True to Himself


I saw an interesting interview by Shannon Sharpe of Mike Tomlin that aired on CBS this past Sunday just before the Steelers took down my beloved Jets.  (The fact that I could no longer find a working link to the video this morning suggests that maybe I’m the only person who found it interesting.)
In the interview, Sharpe asked Tomlin to describe coaches who were influential in making him the coach he is today.  Tomlin said that he was an assistant for two radically different, but similarly successful coaches in Tony Dungy and John Gruden.  Dungy was introspective, deeply religious and emotionally reserved.  Gruden, on the other hand, was emotional, impulsive, and coached by the seat of his pants. 
And yet, despite their differences, Tomlin recognized that they both succeeded in leading teams to championships.  Tomlin acknowledged to Sharpe that this gave him confidence to pick and choose among Dungy’s and Gruden’s traits that were consistent with Tomlin’s coaching style.  In other words, Tomlin didn’t feel compelled to internalize coaching traits that he deemed effective for Gruden or Dungy – he knew he could be himself and still find success.
In my management training workshops, I often ask participants to describe characteristics and behaviors of “walk-through-wall” leaders (that is, a leader for whom the participant would have walked through a wall if the leader had asked them to) they’ve worked for/played for in their past.  As you can imagine, these characteristics run the gamut – honest, approachable, humorous, sensitive, inspiring, detail-oriented, loyal, well-connected, experienced, calm in the face of a storm, etc.  The point of this exercise is not for participants to take stock of all of their shortcomings, but rather for them to see that leaders come in literally all varieties.  No one could possibly possess all of the traits listed – several are invariably mutually exclusive!
Tomlin is a great head coach because he spent considerable time observing and assisting excellent head coaches – among them, Dungy and Gruden – from whom he hand-picked coaching behaviors that he wanted made part of his leadership persona.  But Tomlin’s greatest achievement is his recognition that no matter which of his mentors’ behaviors he adopted, they needed to be consistent with his own management/coaching style.
And whichever behaviors he adopted seem to be working.  Just ask my beloved Jets.

About Sean O'Neil
Sean O’Neil is Principal and CEO of One to One Leadership (www.one2oneleadership.com), a sales and management training firm with clients that include the National Basketball Association, Major League Soccer, News Corporation, First Data, ADP, Xerox, the Oakland Raiders and the New York Knicks.  Sean and John Kulisek co-authored Bare Knuckle People Management:  Creating Success with the Team You Have – Winners, Losers, Misfits and All, which is due to be published in May 2011.  Sean has contributed to or been featured in, among others, The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Selling Power Magazine and Incentive Magazine.

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

The Movement - How Did We Get Here? How Do We Leave?

Been to leadership training recently?  Get the sense your leadership trainers just didn't get "it" or you? 

You know for a fact that they never walked a step in your moccasins, so how is it that they were in the front of the room insisting you do your job the way they tell you to do it? 

What were the trust falls all about?  What about the new age music during breaks?

Why did their proposed "communication models" feel stale and inapplicable to your day-to-day job?  Do they really expect you to say those things to your people?  If they knew you or your people, they would know that you would never - could never - say such words. 

Sure, you're all for recognizing and rewarding good behavior, but what do you do with the knuckleheads on your team who don't really add a stitch of value? 

Isn't there something out there that's more meaningful, practical and applicable to you and your team?

Look, I design and deliver leadership and management training (http://www.one2oneleadership.com/), so I don't want it to go away entirely as an industry.  I just want to readjust the focus.  I want to set aside the word "leadership" in leadership training, because it seems to be getting in the way. 

Leadership training has become a predictably fluffy and theoretical exercise that seems to be more focused on a moment-in-time "inspiration" for the participants (which then, presumably, is expected to be passed on to their direct reports after the training) rather than a learning exercise that provides participants with concrete tools that they can apply to their specific team in their specific company.  There's nothing inherently wrong with inspiration - it's just that the impact is fleeting, and almost never leads to lasting, tangible results.

I want to participate in a movement away from leadership training and towards management training.  Let's concretize the training experience.  Let's not make it only about inspiration and group hugs and celebrations of success.  Let's make it more applicable to the specific participants and their specific employees in their specific work environments.  Let's allow for the fact that your team might have some losers on it...those who just won't cut it.  Let's acknowledge that there is a wide range of personality and talent on your team, and that you need to tailor your style to each team member to maximize the productivity each can deliver.

I don't want to end the dialogue about leadership and management - I just want to shift it so the managers who are the intended recipients can actually put it to use.

About Sean O'Neil
Sean O’Neil is Principal and CEO of One to One Leadership (www.one2oneleadership.com), a sales and management training firm with clients that include the National Basketball Association, Major League Soccer, News Corporation, First Data, ADP, Xerox, the Oakland Raiders and the New York Knicks.  Sean and John Kulisek co-authored Bare Knuckle People Management:  Creating Success with the Team You Have – Winners, Losers, Misfits and All, which is due to be published in May 2011.  Sean has contributed to or been featured in, among others, The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Selling Power Magazine and Incentive Magazine.